The Intersectional Rewrites project is hosting a blog symposium, dedicated to examining the role intersectional analysis plays and could play in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. This blog symposium is designed to complement the Intersectional Rewrites book project by providing an open space for creative thinking on the issues in relation to a wider range of case law than can be covered in the book.
We invite submissions of blogs of no more than 1,500 words. Blogs should be submitted in English to blogsymposium@systemicjustice.ngo. Nozizwe Dube, Adam Weiss, and Nani Jansen Reventlow will select blogs for publication and offer editorial support.
There is no restriction on authors: we invite students, academics, practising lawyers, and anyone else interested in the subject to submit a blog. The only limitation on subject matter is that blogs should relate to the European Court of Human Rights and the critical paradigm of intersectionality. We expect bloggers will want to have a go at rewriting small parts of judgments or critique specific rulings, but we welcome other approaches. If you have doubts about your planned approach, feel free to get in touch.
Blogs will remain on the website as long as the site remains active and are published under a Creative Commons BY SA 4.0 license, meaning that users of the website are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the blogs, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author as long as they cite the source.
Intersectional Rewrites: European Court of Human Rights Judgments Reimagined
The book project “Intersectional Rewrites: European Court of Human Rights Judgments Reimagined” imagines a jurisprudence that rises to the challenge of responding to these intersecting forms of oppression, discrimination, and other human rights harms.
If you would like to support the project or get involved in any way, please get in touch.