The Intersectional Rewrites project is hosting a blog symposium, dedicated to examining the role intersectional analysis plays and could play in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
The European Court of Human Rights (the Court) recently issued its ruling in Mikyas v. Belgium (Mikyas), upholding the ban on visible religious symbols, including
Introduction The impact of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (European Court) on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Inter-American Court) has
This blog symposium, and the project it is part of, are revisiting a number of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights through an
Introduction The experiences of cisgender women are frequently linked to prevailing conceptions about pregnancy and childbirth. Transgender men, as well as other non-binary individuals expressing
Hudorovic and Others v. Slovenia: domestic law prevented indigent Roma from connecting their homes to clean water and sewerage, while the ECtHR assumed they chose
While nearly 35 years have passed since Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term “intersectionality” in her essay, the concept has not gained the prominent role in
In Hämäläinen v. Finland (2014) the European Court of Human Rights (the Court) affirmed Finland’s refusal to register Hämäläinen as a transitioned married woman. This
The recent decision in the case of Caster Semenya is hardly the first instance where the Court was forced to face the music regarding its
Intersectional Rewrites: European Court of Human Rights Judgments Reimagined
The book project “Intersectional Rewrites: European Court of Human Rights Judgments Reimagined” imagines a jurisprudence that rises to the challenge of responding to these intersecting forms of oppression, discrimination, and other human rights harms.
If you would like to support the project or get involved in any way, please get in touch.